tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6866752812895683230.post8872913356454743993..comments2024-03-23T14:49:46.132+01:00Comments on Orienteringsforsøk: The horror! The horror!vhhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16887661953741578765noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6866752812895683230.post-58061624920450348962022-04-17T11:27:10.065+02:002022-04-17T11:27:10.065+02:00Jeg deler dette vitnesbyrdet til partnere som lide...Jeg deler dette vitnesbyrdet til partnere som lider i forholdet sitt fordi det finnes en varig løsning.<br /><br /> Mannen min forlot meg og våre 2 barn for en annen kvinne i 3 år. Jeg prøvde å være sterk bare for barna mine, men jeg kunne ikke kontrollere smertene som plager hjertet mitt. Jeg ble såret og forvirret. Jeg trengte hjelp, så jeg forsket litt på internett og kom over et nettsted der jeg så at Dr. DAWN ACUNA, en trylleformler, kan hjelpe til med å få elskere tilbake. Jeg tok kontakt med henne og hun ba en spesiell bønn og trollformler for meg. Til mine overraskelser kom mannen min hjem etter 3 dager. Det var slik vi ble gjenforent igjen og det var mye kjærlighet, glede og fred i familien.<br /><br /> Du kan også kontakte Dr. DAWN ACUNA for rask løsning.<br /> 1) Hvis du vil gjenforenes med kjæresten din.<br /> 2) Hvis du trenger fred/ glede/ lykke i ekteskapet ditt.<br /> 3) Hvis du ønsker å behandle infertilitet.<br /> 4) Hvis du ønsker å kurere noen form for sykdom, kreft/hiv/blokkrør/etc.<br /> 5) Hvis du ønsker å tiltrekke deg noen inn i livet ditt.<br /> Whatsapp: +2348032246310<br /> E-post: dawnacuna314@gmail.comLindahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09386002117850745789noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6866752812895683230.post-69161260807900121762022-01-30T21:38:56.364+01:002022-01-30T21:38:56.364+01:00jeg kunne ikke tro at jeg noen gang ville bli gjen...jeg kunne ikke tro at jeg noen gang ville bli gjenforent med min eks-kjæreste, jeg var så traumatisert av å være helt alene uten kropp å være ved meg og være sammen med meg, men jeg var så heldig en dag å møte dette mektig trollformler Dr. Kellymanson, etter å ha fortalt ham om situasjonen min gjorde han alt menneskelig mulig for å se at kjæresten min kom tilbake til meg, faktisk etter å ha trollbundet trolldommen kom min eks-kjæreste tilbake til meg mindre enn 48 timer, min eks-elsker kom tilbake til meg tilbake og ber meg om at han aldri vil forlate meg igjen, 3 måneder senere ble vi forlovet og giftet oss, hvis du har samme situasjon er det bare å kontakte Dr Kellymanson på e-posten hans: { Kellymanson520@gmail.com } tusen takk far for at du gjenopprettet eksen min -kjæreste tilbake til meg,<br /> *Hvis du vil gjenforenes med kjæresten din.<br /> *Hvis du ønsker å bli gravid.<br /> *Hvis du vil kurere noen form for sykdom.<br /> Kontakt ham for løsning: Whatsapp { +2348162103711 }<br /> E-post: { Kellymanson520@gmail.com }Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04354173294060467642noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6866752812895683230.post-15936506111734493362013-05-22T00:21:52.845+02:002013-05-22T00:21:52.845+02:00Thanks. Pardon me for not replying sooner. I have ...Thanks. Pardon me for not replying sooner. I have been without Internet access for a few days and only now read your comments.<br /><br />In the end I too might find Gaita’s claims about what people can and cannot do a little strained. However, I do not think they are strained for empirical reasons. I believe his claims are a little subtler than that. Some people do indeed react as Gaita claims they cannot. But Gaita is hardly unaware of this. His "cannot" is used in a moral rather than an empirical sense here. Gaita is not denying that some people do in fact respond to slaughter as they do to murder –- he is writing about Elizabeth Costello after all –- but he thinks these reactions are (as someone says of Costello’s claims in the novel) jejune and sentimental. Gaita has, if I am not mistaken, compared sentimentality to drunkenness somewhere. A drunken person might in fact threaten to rough someone up for accidentally spilling beer on his suit -- but this doesn’t mean that this is <i>something we do</i>. The drunkard might of course (in some boozy sense) <i>mean</i> every word, he might even think his reaction is entirely appropriate, but this does in no way speak in his favor. While drunk, no one is thinking straight. Any sober person would judge his reaction as entirely out of place. I take Gaita to be saying similar things about Costello. No one –- that is no sober person, no one in his right (i.e. sentimentally undisturbed) mind -- could seriously think Costello is right in describing factory farming as an evil comparable to that of the Holocaust. I am not sure I find this convincing.<br /><br />What you say about Gaita’s larger point seem all right to me, including the fact that one could always suggest that these points are just further evidences of our own speciesism.<br /><br />The passage from “The Philosophers and the Animals” you are thinking of is this:<br /><br /><i>we are surrounded by an enterprise of degradation, cruelty and killing which rivals anything that the Third Reich was capable of, indeed dwarfs it, in that ours is an enterprise without end, self-regenerating, bringing rabbits, rats, poultry, live-stock ceaselessly into the world for the purpose of killing them.</i> <br /><br />I agree that this is Costello in a more argumentative mode. (Though, only a page later, Costello describes this as scoring a cheap point -– an instance of heated polemic, rather than the cool philosophical way of speaking she is actually seeking.) I am currently working on a follow-up post where I, among other things, will be addressing the question this raises.vhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16887661953741578765noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6866752812895683230.post-56685787077777879382013-05-15T15:33:33.492+02:002013-05-15T15:33:33.492+02:00This is nicely done. I have gained much from readi...This is nicely done. I have gained much from reading Gaita's various works, but as I gain some reflective distance, I now find some of what he does rather strained. For instance, "we do not and cannot respond to what happens in the abattoir as we respond to murder." But as a good Wittgensteinian, shouldn't he be speaking for himself? <i>He</i> may not be able to respond to animal slaughter in that way, but there are real people who do feel something like what Costello feels. So as a "can" claim, what he says is just false, I think. But at the same time, there is some truth in his larger point that the secondary response (what's to be done about the culprits) may be different, insofar as animal activists don't generally lobby for the incarceration of cattle ranchers and butchers. So he's right that there are differences. But one could always suggest that that particular difference is just further evidence of our own speciesism! <br /><br />But I agree that what Costello is trying to give is not so much an argument but rather expression to her own sense of horror and confusion by offering the Holocaust images as a point of comparison. (One might, however, bear in mind that in "The Philosophers and the Animals," she actually says, in an argumentative mode, that factory-farming is in a way <i>worse</i> than the Holocaust because the cycle of farming and slaughter is "without end"...)Matthew Pianaltohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16380038537888895216noreply@blogger.com